As policymakers in the United
States, Europe and Asia grapple with the long-term affordability of
their pensions systems, a new World Bank report says that growing
demographic and economic pressures are forcing both developing and
developed countries to undertake urgent pension reform.
According to the report -- Old-Age
Income Support in the Twenty-First Century: An International
Perspective on Pensions and Reform, more women in the global
workforce, rising divorce rates, changing employment patterns in
the global economy, rising budget deficits, and rising numbers of
elderly are making the case for pension reform unavoidable.
"This report shows us that while
pension reforms in most countries initially are driven by the
short-term budgetary woes of keeping costly public systems afloat,
the more important longer-term problems of worldwide ageing and
social change, along with changes in our global economy are an
equally important to the debate," says Robert Holzmann, Director of
the World Bank's Social Protection unit, co-author of the new
report, and a leading international authority on pension
reform.
The report offers a common framework
to help countries resolve their pension problems, proposing the
diversification of pension systems into a combination of public
elements to maintain minimum living standards, and privately
managed and funded components, while emphasizing the potential
links between pension reform and conditions conducive to growth and
development. It says that most public pension schemes were not
designed to deliver current benefit levels when confronted with
today's major demographic and economic changes. Therefore, keeping
existing systems afloat will require either cutting public spending
on health and education, or cutting pensions drastically for the
next generations of elderly.
In many cases, the report says,
actual budget costs are hardly ever calculated in a comprehensive
or transparent manner, and in most cases, pensions schemes fail to
grasp the standard 'actuarial' principles involved in effective
pension systems. The Bank, which has been involved in pension
reform in more than 80 countries and provided financial support for
reform to more than 60, says if problems like these are not solved,
falling economic growth and greater poverty may be the end
result.
Holzmann says keeping unaffordable
pensions systems afloat, with continual budget transfers, are often
the main cause of high and rising budget deficits. These in turn
can worsen a country's macro-economic outlook during times of
economic crisis. The most drastic recent example so far is that of
Brazil in 1998, where a fiscal deficit of more than 6 percent of
GDP triggered a crisis in the aftermath of the East Asian and
Russian financial crises. Two-thirds of this deficit, some 4
percent of GDP, was due to the cost of pensions.
Second, if the government wants to
minimize the destabilizing effects of high budgetary transfers, it
has to raise more taxes or make budget cuts elsewhere. Because of
the difficulty of raising taxes, governments in many developing
countries choose to prune back other social spending, typically for
health and education. For example, higher pension costs for retired
teachers simply reduce the number of new teachers that can be hired
under an already constrained budget envelope for education. In
other cases, teachers have to stay on the payroll after retirement
age because there are insufficient resources in the retirement fund
to pay their pension; as a result, no new teachers can be
hired.
Changing societies and
employment patterns
Over and above the economic impetus
for reform are profound changes in societies and the ways in which
people now work.
More women in workforce -- the
numbers of women in the workforce worldwide have jumped
considerably in recent decades, but pension systems have not
adapted to this change. Most pension systems are designed for
workers with full, un-interrupted careers, which does not reflect
the experience of most women, who may leave their jobs to raise
children earn lower wages, and typically outlive their husbands by
several years. Lifelong marriage has also become the exception,
rather than the rule in many countries. In many OECD countries, for
example, divorce rates are so high that some 50 percent of
marriages are thought unlikely to survive, resulting in large
numbers of older individuals living in single households. All of
these trends place women at greater risk of poverty in old age
unless pension systems are adapted to meet their needs.
Changing work patterns -- this more
recent development refers to the reduction in full-time salaried
jobs, and the increase in part-time work, self- employment, and
temporary jobs. This trend may be attributed to globalization and
its competitive pressures. Whatever the reason, these workers do
not fare well under many current pension schemes, which are based
on a full-time employment model. Pension systems will need to be
extended to provide access and portability of benefits to these
21st century workers or many will be at risk of severe poverty in
old age.
Lack of pension coverage -- for poor
people, and workers who move in and out of formal employment,
pension coverage in most developing countries is still very low.
Improving coverage requires reforming expensive and unsustainable
system; thinking about the introduction of social pensions if older
poor people are more vulnerable than other 'at-risk' groups in the
population such as children and disabled people, and the financing
can be assured; and introducing, or improving, voluntary and funded
systems which are better able to help informal sector
workers.
Numbers of elderly on the increase
-- the world's elderly population is growing briskly as a result of
increasing life expectancy and falling fertility rates. It will
result in a steadily rising average age of the population
throughout the world, a rising number of elderly (age 65 and
above), an even greater increase in the number of very elderly (85
and above), and a rising ratio of elderly (65 and above) to
working-age population (15 to 64). This trend is most pronounced in
Europe and Japan and least pronounced in Africa and the Middle
East, but it is a reality in nearly all countries, and is occurring
at a much faster pace in the developing than in the developed
world. While nearly 60 percent of the elderly live in developing
countries, that share is projected to increase to 80 percent by
2050. The developed economies got rich before they got old,
developing countries are getting old before they get rich but both
face profound challenges as a result of population aging.
This has two main implications.
First, pension systems that collect taxes from one generation to
provide benefits to their parents will need to be adjusted to
address the realities that elderly people live longer lives today
than was anticipated when these systems were first designed.
Second, pension systems will need to be more flexible to provide
incentives for older workers to delay their retirement until later
in life in order to maintain a sufficient workforce to sustain
growth. This makes it even more important to offer effective
retirement-income support for the elderly, and to assess carefully
the trade-offs, as well as synergies, between money spent to
achieve growth objectives (such as education and health
expenditure), and funds directed to alleviate the vulnerability to
poverty of groups such as children and the disabled.
"Pension reforms in a wide variety
of countries, from Central and Eastern Europe to Latin America, and
Asia, have already led to systems that will provide a solid
foundation for future growth and security. Governments in other
regions need to learn from this experience to undertake reforms
before they are overwhelmed by the fiscal and social costs of not
having acted quickly and comprehensively enough," says Richard
Hinz, co-author of the new pension report, and a World Bank Adviser
on Pension Policy.
{For a comprehensive description of
how different regions and countries are coping with the challenges
of pension reform, see Chapter 7, Regional Experiences:
Developments and First Evaluation of Reform, at page 141}
Solutions -- no one size
fits all
According to the new Bank report,
the past decade has underscored the importance of pension systems
to the economic stability of countries and the security of their
aging populations. The experience with reforms over the past ten
years has also shown that no one size fits all -- that countries
have a number of different combinations of the elements of an
effective pension system to choose from, depending on their own
national circumstances. What also emerges is the continued
relevance of the two main aims of pension systems, namely: reducing
poverty, and eliminating the risk of rapidly falling living
standards in retirement; and the broader goal of protecting
vulnerable elderly people from economic and social crises.
Given these aims, the Bank believes
that the multi-pillar design is the best solution to pension
reform, being much more flexible and better able to address the
different risks that pension systems are designed to manage.
Advance funding and market-oriented investments are regarded as key
elements of most reforms, but the limits of funding are also seen
much more sharply.
The suggested multi-pillar framework
is composed of some combination of five basic elements: (a) a
noncontributory or "zero pillar" (in the form of a demogrant or
social pension) that provides a minimal level of protection; 1 (b)
a "first-pillar" contributory system that is linked to varying
degrees to earnings and seeks to replace some portion of income;
(c) a mandatory "second pillar" that is essentially an individual
savings account but can be constructed in a variety of ways; (d)
voluntary "third-pillar" arrangements that can take many forms
(individual, employer-sponsored, defined benefit, defined
contribution) but are essentially flexible and discretionary in
nature; and (e) informal intra-family or inter-generational sources
of both financial and non-financial support to the elderly,
including access to health care and housing.
For a variety of reasons, a system
that incorporates as many of these elements as possible, depending
on the preferences of individual countries as well as the level and
incidence of transaction costs, can, through diversification,
deliver retirement income more effectively and efficiently. The key
challenge outlined in the report is how to combine these different
features into a comprehensive system that both, meets the local
needs of each country, and charts a roadmap for feasible
reform.
(China.org.cn May 25, 2005)
|