China's top environment
watchdog has fined the Jilin Petrochemical Company, a subsidiary of
PetroChina, the maximum 1 million yuan (US$125,000), for seriously
polluting the Songhua River.
An explosion at the company's chemical plant in
northeast China's Jilin Province in November 2005 dumped about
100 tons of waste containing benzene into the nearby Songhua
River.
The incident forced cities along the river, including
Harbin, capital of northeastern Heilongjiang Province downstream, to cut water
supplies to 3.8 million people for several days.
Under Chinese law, companies can only be fined a
maximum of 1 million yuan (US$125,000) for causing
pollution.
The State Environmental Protection Administration
(SEPA) found the company guilty of contravening the Environmental
Protection Law and two articles of the law on Prevention and
Control of Water Pollution.
The incident triggered the resignation last year of
China's former environmental chief Xie Zhenhua.
As well 10 executives of PetroChina have received
demerits on their personal record, including Duan Wende, senior
vice president PetroChina.
SEPA has rarely applied the heaviest penalty to
companies that cause pollution, Thursday's China Youth Daily
reported.
Experts argued that the fine was inappropriately low
considering the losses caused by the incident.
Professor Wang Jin from the Peking University filed a
lawsuit one month after the incident, demanding compensation of 10
billion yuan (US$1.25 billion) from the company to restore the
environment.
The case was not accepted by the court, but sparked
discussions over who should foot the bill for cleaning up the
environment. The government spent huge sums during the pollution
crisis and on the clean-up.
It again highlighted an embarrassing situation for
China's environmental protection departments which are constrained
by the current legal and policy system, the newspaper
said.
The Environmental Protection Law has not been changed
since 1989. Many complain it is too "soft" with fines that are too
low and local environmental watchdogs have few teeth.
Some companies find it is cheaper to pay a fine than
it is to improve their pollution controls, the report
said.
In addition, companies can be fined only once for a
particular pollution incident in a certain period, prompting
experts to call for a system under which companies can be fined for
each day they violate pollution laws.
(Xinhua News Agency January 26, 2007)
|